Frankfort Kentucky April 2, 2009:
2006 Background
Amy Mischler filed a complaint against Pike County Attorney Howard Keith Hall on June 6, 2006 alleging the EXACT SAME VIOLATIONS OF CRIMINAL STATUTES against Hall that Greg Stumbo charged then Governor Ernie Fletcher with. The complaint was to be sent to the Prosecutors Advisory Council outlining how Hall was using the child support office for political purposes by refusing to prosecute child support against his political allies, and targeting his political enemies.
However, what Mischler did not know at that time is the Howard Keith Hall was a campaign contributor and close political ally with then Attorney General Greg Stumbo.
The Prosecutors Advisory Council never saw the complaint. Instead, the grievance was given to Jeffrey R. Prather who filed the document below. That document first notified Hall that a complaint had been filed against him by Mischler. Then Prather engaged in FRAUD stating that the Office of Attorney General does not have jurisdiction over crimes committed by prosecutors. Third, Prather assured Hall that he had the full support of the Office of Attorney General and that they would assist Hall in anyway to resolve the issue. Hall received this letter from Prather on Friday, June 9, 2006
Then on Monday June 12, 2006: Hall’s response to resolve the issue was for his office to type up a one sentence arrest warrant against Amy Mischler on a groundless charge on. Hall even had his office to prosecute Mischler for five months until she noticed the case file that Hall was engaging in an egregious conflict of interest breach.
The single criminal charge against Mischler was dismissed in May 2007. However, Pike Commonwealth Attorney Rick Bartley still elected to take Mischler to the Pike Grand Jury where the Grand Jury refused to indict Mischler. When the Pike Grand Jury asked for testimony from Mischler concerning Hall; Bartley refused to let the Pike Grand Jury to continue.
Stumbo, Hall, and Bartley have been sued for Malicious Prosecution by Mischler in the Franklin Circuit Court. It is case 08-CI-1039 with Judge Phillip Shepherd presiding.
OAG employees Abuse Subpoena Server
The purposeful failure of Howard Keith Hall to refuse to prosecute a personal friend Attorney Jonah Stevens for child support from June 2005 is a material fact in a custody case between Jonah Stevens and Amy Mischler. As is the letter from Jeffrey Prather which
fraudulently states that the OAG has no jurisdiction over a public corruption fraud.
Mischler who represents herself Pro Se issued a subpoena against Jeffrey Prather who is currently in the OAG Special Prosecutions Unit at 1024 Capital Center Drive in Frankfort Kentucky. To save on costs she had her brother Ralph Mischler Jr., to serve the subpoena to Prather.
On April 1, 2009, Pike County Trial Commissioner Fred Hatfield who signed the groundless 2006 arrest warrant against Amy Mischler threw a subpoena at Ralph Mischler which hit Mischler in the chest and flew up toward his eyes; Hatfield refused to accept the subpoena. Due to the erratic nature of Hatfield; Ralph Mischler openly carried an audio recording device in case Prather acted as bizarrley as Hatfield did.
When Mischler requested to see Prather to give him the subpoena inside of the OAG offices; FOUR OAG EMPLOYEES came out and encircled Ralph Mischler and refused to let him leave. One of those employees then turned off the audio recording device which Mischler carried in the open.
Mischler was then frisked and forced to show identification. He was questioned about where he worked, where he served in the military. Then OAG employees began to question him about Amy Mischler, including who she worked for. OAG employees threatened to arrest Ralph Mischler then told him that the subpoena was invalid because Amy Mischler was not an attorney.
Further, while Amy Mischler was sitting in the parking lot waiting for Ralph Mischler; an OAG employee came out and took the license plate number of the car that Amy Mischler was sitting in. Observing this, Amy Mischler got out of the car and took a picture of the employee which is above. Seeing the camera; the OAG employee then pretended to be on a cigarette break.
There are multiple investigations of this matter by both state and federal agencies. A subpoena server in Kentucky is considered a court official while in the process of serving the subpoena. Any threats, physical assaults, or other abuse against a subpoena server are considered under the law to be the same as if those acts happened to a judge, circuit court clerk, or any other court official while in court. More will be published on this story at the Justice Watch as the criminal and civil courts take up cases against these lawless acts by Office of Attorney General employees.
